Mark It: On Thursday night I’ll be joined on TNB by Bill Kristol and Tim Miller to give you a sense of where we are less than two weeks out from Election Day.

Thursday, 8pm Eastern. Only for Bulwark+ members. Leave us a question.

1) What Do Journalists Do?

Last night while John Fetterman and Sen. Dr. Oz were debating, a small skirmish broke out on Twitter between some journalists and some Democrats. Here’s the short version:

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

Olivia obviously doesn't need me to defend her but the fact that iu read this tweet and was like "oh people are going to lose it at her" is insane. Like, she's just making an observation about his performance in a debate as a viewer.

Olivia Nuzzi @Olivianuzzi

There is no amount of empathy for and understanding about Fetterman’s health and recovery that changes the fact that this is absolutely painful to watch.

1:54 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

415Likes25Retweets

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

Olivia doesn't work for the democratic party. Her job isn't to walk the line that is most beneficial to the democratic candidate in Pennsylvania. Her job is to share her honest opinions and not lie to her readers about what she thinks.

1:56 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

205Likes11Retweets

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

if you are a columnist who is watching the events of the world and having secret judgmental thoughts that you do not share, you are lying to your readers. You exist to share those judgments.

2:17 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

64Likes3Retweets

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

If you are afraid that it will imperil the chances of the party you possibly favor in an election or you are quite because you are afraid of getting dragged on twitter, you suck at your job and you are a coward or a whore.

2:19 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

55Likes3Retweets

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

like if youre a journalist who thinks your job is to help the democrats win elections or republicans win elections or do whatever, fine, but quit and just go work for them! They'll pay you to do that!!!

2:23 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

96Likes3Retweets

Ben Dreyfuss @bendreyfuss

Your one fucking job is to not lie to people.

2:24 AM ∙ Oct 26, 2022

---

104Likes4Retweets

Let’s talk about this.

First, a stipulation: I agree with Dreyfuss on principle. Totally and completely. That’s literally part of the mission statement at The Bulwark: We tell you what we really think.1

But can you explain to me why the Washington Post pays Hugh Hewitt? Or what is being produced at Fox? Or the Wall Street Journal? Or basically anywhere in conservative media?

Dreyfuss says that if you’re not telling people what you really think, then you’re bad at your job. Is that true? For some jobs in this industry, yes. For jobs in the “mainstream” media, or in “real journalism,” mostly yes. At The Bulwark, yes.

But for many jobs in other precincts of journalism, the mission is to rep the team. No matter what. Arguing for Team Red is the entirety of the job. It is both what the audience wants and what the journalistic institution pays for.

Now, you can say, “Oh, but those aren’t real journalists at those places.” Why not? They sure as shit get treated like real journalists. They have platforms and credentials and audiences and lawyers and advertisers and subscribers. They say that they’re real journalists and there’s no professional licensing board to say they’re wrong.

What has happened in America is that we have a two-tier system of standards.2 We expect “real journalists” to tell us what they really think. Imperfectly, and with some biases; we know they do and will make mistakes and all that. Granted. But what we expect from “conservative journalists” is entirely different. We expect them to act as perpetual propagandists for their team.3

Those expectations are baked into the culture, on both sides. No one questions them.

I would like to tell you that in the long run, the relative diversity and honesty of “real journalists” will strengthen the cause of liberal democracy. That being honest about what you really think is a form of road-testing ideas, which invites good feedback and spurs meaningful debate, which refines those ideas, which in turn helps our democracy self-correct. I’d like to tell you that propaganda is brittle and self-recursive and ineffective.

But I don’t think that’s the truth.