I am interested in the changing model for journalists. It appears that to be successful you have to be good at writing/reporting and marketing. I am a digital subscriber to the LA Times and it appears that they attempt to leverage columnists (they appear to have a fair number in all the different areas of the paper). They publicize them.…
I am interested in the changing model for journalists. It appears that to be successful you have to be good at writing/reporting and marketing. I am a digital subscriber to the LA Times and it appears that they attempt to leverage columnists (they appear to have a fair number in all the different areas of the paper). They publicize them. Many haven their own newsletter/facebook or whatever. But I havent seen anything about how well this is working. I find on national stories the LA TImes does better than the NY TImes (of which I also have a digital subscription). I am sure it helps to have a billionaire owner but are they making money this way?
I am interested in the changing model for journalists. It appears that to be successful you have to be good at writing/reporting and marketing. I am a digital subscriber to the LA Times and it appears that they attempt to leverage columnists (they appear to have a fair number in all the different areas of the paper). They publicize them. Many haven their own newsletter/facebook or whatever. But I havent seen anything about how well this is working. I find on national stories the LA TImes does better than the NY TImes (of which I also have a digital subscription). I am sure it helps to have a billionaire owner but are they making money this way?