Bulwark+

Share this post

The Three Histories of Conservatism

plus.thebulwark.com

The Three Histories of Conservatism

Was MAGA always the inevitable endpoint of conservatism?

Jonathan V. Last
Mar 16
181
481
Share this post

The Three Histories of Conservatism

plus.thebulwark.com

No TNB tonight. But to make it up to you, I’m going to start unpacking something I mentioned as an aside on Tuesday.


(Composite / Photos: GettyImages / Shutterstock)

1. Mind Palaces

On Tuesday I offered a question:

In 2016, Trump believed that the conservative movement was so desiccated and weak that it could be overthrown without risking schism. That the conservatism of the last 60 years was a spent force, which would accommodate itself to whatever a strongman demanded of it.

He was correct. There’s no real argument about that.

The question is whether or not a healthy conservatism ever truly existed in the first place, or if it was just the intellectuals’ mind palace.

My tentative answer was that (a) I could argue this both ways and (b) there was a third option: conservatism as a cargo cult.

So let me make my best case for all three and then you can discuss amongst yourselves. But here’s my ask for the comments: When you explain which answer you believe is the truest, I’d also like you to caveat it and explain why you might be wrong.

And I say “truest” because in the most basic sense all three of these options are true to some degree. It’s not either/or; it’s both/and. The question isn’t which explanation is correct—it’s which explanation is the biggest driver.

So let’s start with Stuart Stevens.


(1) It was all a lie. That’s the title of Stuart’s fantastic book about his journey through conservative politics and his thesis is that the current state of the conservative movement / Republican party was the inevitable endpoint.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2023 Bulwark Media
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing